| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 Acura RSX and 2010 Dodge Dakota Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Model | Acura RSX | Dodge Dakota | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 Acura RSX
| 2006 Acura RSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2006 | 2dr Hatch 201-horsepower 2.0L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The rear seat is not much use if the front passengers are over 6ft. Very little head/leg room. But you don’t buy this type of car to haul 4 people around. But in a pinch I’ve had 4 in there, and I’m 6’4”. see full Acura RSX review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Dodge Dakota
| 2010 Dodge Dakota Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Cheap, cramped and very uncomfortable. see full Dodge Dakota review |
| 2010 | 4dr Crew Cab 5.5ft bed 302-horsepower 4.7L V8 5-speed automatic 4WD, part-time w/low range |
Passengers noticed very cramped in comparison to the Ridgleine see full Dodge Dakota review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
