Model Year | 2016 | 2006 | |
Model | Acura TLX | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 290 hp@6200 267 lb-ft@4500 |
4.6L V8 OHC-2v 300 hp@5750 320 lb-ft@4500 |
|
Transmission | 9-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 109.3 in | 107.1 in | 2.2 in |
Length | 190.3 in | 187.6 in | 2.7 in |
Width | 73.0 in | 73.9 in | -0.9 in |
Height | 57.0 in | 55.4 in | 1.6 in |
Curb Weight | 3585 lb. | 3525 lb. | 60 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 17.2 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 1.2 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 37.2 in | 38.6 in | -1.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.5 in | 55.4 in | 2.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.3 in | 53.6 in | 1.7 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.6 in | 42.7 in | -0.1 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 36.7 in | 34.7 in | 2 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 55.4 in | 53.4 in | 2 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.9 in | 46.8 in | 8.1 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 34.5 in | 30.3 in | 4.2 in |
Total Legroom | 77.1 in (over 2 rows) | 73 in (over 2 rows) | 4.1 in |
Cargo Volume | 13.2 ft3 | 13.1 ft3 | 0.1 ft3 |
2016 Acura TLX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
While the Acura TLX's exterior dimensions roughly split the difference between the TSX's and the TL's, its interior dimensions are quite close to the more compact of the two. Compared to the Honda Accord, rear seat legroom is down a substantial four inches despite a shared wheelbase. Shoulder room and rear headroom also suffer reductions, of about an inch in each case. At 5-9, I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare. Passengers six feet and up will feel cramped, if they fit at all. The Lincoln is also weak in this area. If others an inch or two more rear knee room than the TLX, but less rear headroom. see full Acura TLX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Acura TLX.
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |