| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Acura TSX and 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Acura TSX | Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban | |
| Engine | 3.5L V6 OHC-4v 280 hp@6200 254 lb-ft@5000 |
5.3L V8 OHV-2v 355 hp@5600 383 lb-ft@4100 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | RWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 106.6 in | 116.0 in | -9.4 in |
| Length | 186.2 in | 204.0 in | -17.8 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 80.5 in | -8 in |
| Height | 56.7 in | 74.4 in | -17.7 in |
| Curb Weight | 3680 lb. | 5466 lb. | -1786 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.5 gal. | 26.0 gal. | -7.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.6 in | 42.8 in | -5.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 57.8 in | 64.8 in | -7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.6 in | 60.8 in | -5.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 45.3 in | -2.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.0 in | 38.7 in | -1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 56.1 in | 65.1 in | -9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.2 in | 60.3 in | -6.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.3 in | 39.0 in | -4.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.1 in | -38.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 62.6 in | -62.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 49.3 in | -49.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 24.8 in | -24.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 76.7 in (over 2 rows) | 109.1 in (over 3 rows) | -32.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 12.6 ft3 | 15.3 ft3 | -2.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 12.6 | 51.6 ft3 | -39 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 12.6 ft3 | 94.7 ft3 | -82.1 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura TSX
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Drove 4 straight hours in these seats. They hug in corners and don't leave you butt feeling numb even after long drives. Not many seats out there that are more comfortable (Volvo is one of the makers that comes to mind with better seats) see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats can be a little tight for people on the tallish side (for me, anything above 5'10"). This can get more complicated with a tall driver/front passenger and tall rear seat occupants. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The trunk space is adequate, but get a hatchback or wagon (or SUV if you're into that sort of thing) if you're going to regularly carrying anything more than the usual grocery bags, suitcases, golf bags, etc. That said, the 60/40 split fold rear seats will allow for surprisingly longish items to fit (managed a 6 foot ladder, barely). see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are fairly comfortable, but they only provide about 34" of legroom, and there is very little clearance below the seats. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
If the front seats are pushed back, not a lot of foot room in back see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
There could have been a bit more rear leg space - althoug, the seats are pretty comfortable. see full Acura TSX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Some (perhaps more than some) people are drawn to large SUVs because they like to feel like the king of the road when behind the wheel. Others need a lot of space while driving, or at least feel they do. Few vehicles have more front seat room than the new Tahoe. With an inch-and-a-half less shoulder room, the Ford's front-row dimensions aren't quite as generous, and its taller, shifter-festooned console is more intrusive. The front seats are comfortable in both. The Expedition's are a little wider and softer, and they're upholstered with especially rich hides in the King Ranch and Platinum (vs. the most recently tested and photographed Limited). Whether this is preferable is a matter of taste. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | |
| 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Both the Tahoe and Expedition have roomy, comfortable second-row seats, with a slight edge to the higher cushions in the Chevrolet. Bonus points to the Tahoe for automatic rear climate controls (they're manual in the Expedition). Move to the third-row seat, and you'll wonder why, despite redesigns for 2007 and 2015, General Motors has stubbornly refused to follow Ford's 2003 switch from a solid rear axle to an independent rear suspension. With a solid axle, the rear floor must be high to permit the rear differential to travel up and down when a wheel hits a bump. Consequently, the Tahoe's third row seat must be very thinly constructed and mounted very close to the floor. Even pre-teen children won't be comfortable in it. In sharp contrast, the Expedition's third-row seat is higher off the floor than its second-row seat, much less the ridiculously low third row in the Tahoe, and is--surprise--considerably more comfortable as a result. The Suburban's third-row seat is roomier than the Tahoe's but still far inferior to the Expedition's. see full Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe / Suburban.
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
