| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Acura TSX and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2013 | |
| Model | Acura TSX | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | 2.4L I4 DOHC-4v 205 hp@6800 164 lb-ft@4500 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 5-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | FWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 105.1 in | 104.8 in | 0.3 in |
| Length | 183.4 in | 171.5 in | 11.9 in |
| Width | 69.4 in | 77.4 in | -8 in |
| Height | 57.3 in | 64.4 in | -7.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3345 lb. | 3680 lb. | -335 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 17.1 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -1.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.8 in | 40.3 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.4 in | 56.6 in | -1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 54.4 in | 0.0 in | 54.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 43.1 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.3 in | 39.7 in | -2.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.5 in | 55.4 in | -1.9 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.4 in | 0.0 in | 54.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.2 in | 35.7 in | -1.5 in |
| Total Legroom | 76.6 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -2.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.2 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -7.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.2 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | -37.8 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Acura TSX
| 2008 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 205-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
able to undertake long drives in comfort. Able to enter/leave car without being contortionist. Easy copes with my (very) large body frame. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 205-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Passengers love the car. Never had any complaints. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2008 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
There could have been a bit more rear leg space - althoug, the seats are pretty comfortable. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
If the front seats are pushed back, not a lot of foot room in back see full Acura TSX review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 205-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Smaller than comparably priced sedans. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 205-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Not enough of it. see full Acura TSX review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Acura models.
