| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2009 Audi A3 and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2009 | 2013 | |
| Model | Audi A3 | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | 3.2L V6 DOHC-4v 250 hp@6300 236 lb-ft@2800 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed automated manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Hatch | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 101.5 in | 104.8 in | -3.3 in |
| Length | 168.7 in | 171.5 in | -2.8 in |
| Width | 69.5 in | 77.4 in | -7.9 in |
| Height | 56.0 in | 64.4 in | -8.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 3660 lb. | 3680 lb. | -20 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 15.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -3.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.1 in | 40.3 in | -2.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.3 in | 56.6 in | -2.3 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.2 in | 43.1 in | -1.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 36.9 in | 39.7 in | -2.8 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 52.8 in | 55.4 in | -2.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 34.8 in | 35.7 in | -0.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 76 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -2.8 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.1 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -7.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 54.6 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | 3.6 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Audi A3
| 2009 Audi A3 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
A lot less leg room when compared to the GTI, but the rear hatch space is bigger. see full Audi A3 review |
| 2008 | 4dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Really just a 4 place vehicle...3 across in the rear is not comfortably possible. see full Audi A3 review |
| 2008 | 4dr Hatch turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual FWD |
Slightly too close to each other in arm room. see full Audi A3 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
