| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2007 Audi Q7 and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2007 | 2014 | |
| Model | Audi Q7 | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 118.2 in | 107.1 in | 11.1 in |
| Length | 200.2 in | 188.5 in | 11.7 in |
| Width | 78.1 in | 73.9 in | 4.2 in |
| Height | 68.4 in | 55.8 in | 12.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 5015 lb. | 3501 lb. | 1514 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 26.4 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 10.4 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 39.5 in | 38.5 in | 1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 55.3 in | 3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 53.4 in | -53.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.4 in | -1.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 39.0 in | 34.7 in | 4.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.1 in | 47.8 in | 10.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 46.8 in | -46.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 37.1 in | 29.8 in | 7.3 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 35.4 in | 0.0 in | 35.4 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 48.6 in | 0.0 in | 48.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 29.2 in | 0.0 in | 29.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 107.6 in (over 3 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 35.4 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 10.9 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | -2.5 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 40.1 ft3 | 13.4 | 26.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 88.7 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 75.3 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2007 Audi Q7
| 2007 Audi Q7 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr SUV 280-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The middle seat of all the SUVs we looked at, had the most room to move furthest forward or backward to allow far rear seat passengers most accommodation. see full Audi Q7 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 280-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Rear seat legroom is greater than other vehicles I evaluated in this category: Acura MDX, BMW X5, Mercedes ML; seats more plush; more cargo space. see full Audi Q7 review |
| 2007 | 4dr SUV 350-horsepower 4.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Great front seats for long drives. see full Audi Q7 review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all Audi models.
