Model Year | 2011 | 2017 | |
Model | Audi TT | Chevrolet SS | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Hatch | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 97.2 in | 114.8 in | -17.6 in |
Length | 164.5 in | 195.5 in | -31 in |
Width | 72.5 in | 74.7 in | -2.2 in |
Height | 53.5 in | 57.9 in | -4.4 in |
Curb Weight | 3153 lb. | 3997 lb. | -844 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 16.3 gal. | 18.8 gal. | -2.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 37.7 in | 38.7 in | -1 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.2 in | 59.1 in | -5.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 57.2 in | -57.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.1 in | 42.3 in | -1.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 32.6 in | 38.0 in | -5.4 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 47.5 in | 59.0 in | -11.5 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 58.0 in | -58 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 29.2 in | 39.7 in | -10.5 in |
Total Legroom | 70.3 in (over 2 rows) | 82 in (over 2 rows) | -11.7 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.1 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | -3.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 24.7 ft3 | 16.4 ft3 | 8.3 ft3 |
2011 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Convertible turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD |
Never had a two seater with this much room for a 6 footer plus. Total comfort all around see full Audi TT review |
2011 Audi TT Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 211hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD |
I like the looks, but there is a downside. As a geezer, getting in and out of the car is not easy. You sit down low, and it has these little gangster windows. see full Audi TT review |
2010 | 2dr Hatch turbocharged 265hp 2.0L I4 6-speed automated manual AWD |
if you can call them rear seats... literally zero leg room or headroom in the back. rear seats (if you can call them that) is only fit for children or short people with no legs... see full Audi TT review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |