| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 BMW 1-Series and 2015 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2015 | |
| Model | BMW 1-Series | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 104.7 in | 107.1 in | -2.4 in |
| Length | 172.2 in | 188.3 in | -16.1 in |
| Width | 68.8 in | 75.4 in | -6.6 in |
| Height | 56.0 in | 54.4 in | 1.6 in |
| Curb Weight | 3208 lb. | 3526 lb. | -318 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 14.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.9 in | 37.6 in | 0.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 54.0 in | 56.3 in | -2.3 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.9 in | -54.9 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.4 in | 42.0 in | -0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.1 in | 34.8 in | 2.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 53.4 in | 52.2 in | 1.2 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 47.4 in | -47.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 32.0 in | 30.6 in | 1.4 in |
| Total Legroom | 73.4 in (over 2 rows) | 72.6 in (over 2 rows) | 0.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 10.0 ft3 | 13.5 ft3 | -3.5 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series
| 2013 BMW 1-Series Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2013 | You simply can't find a much better driver seat for a combination of long-distance comfort and support during aggressive cornering than the one in the BMW 135is. The seat feels firm and substantial, but with enough padding that church pew metaphors will remain far from your mind. The side bolsters are power-adjustable, so they can be snug when you want them to be snug, but not otherwise. Neither of the other cars has adjustable bolsters, and the Z's are too widely spaced for my average build. The BMW's seats also felt the most comfortable to me. see full BMW 1-Series review | |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 BMW 1-Series.
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
| 2015 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Ford Mustang.
See TrueDelta's information for all Hatchbacks
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
