Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
Model | BMW X3 | Honda CR-Z | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,809 mm | 2,436 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,669 mm | 4,079 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,882 mm | 1,740 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,679 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,828 kg | 1,196 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 67 L | 40 L | 27 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 937 mm | -936 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,455 mm | 1,367 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,308 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 0 mm | 993 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 0 mm | 927 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,941 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,085 mm (over 1 row) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 782 L | 711 L | 71 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 25.1 | -24.1 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 BMW X3.
2012 Honda CR-Z Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Hatch 122-horsepower 1.5L I4 Hybrid 7-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
No rear seats in the US version, which greatly reduces passenger utility. However, the storage space is much bigger than many cars in the same price range. Driver and passenger seats are otherwise adequately comfortable. see full Honda CR-Z review |