Model Year | 2016 | 2019 | |
Model | BMW X3 | Mazda CX-5 | |
Engine | turbocharged 2.0L I4 Diesel DOHC-4v 134 kW@4000 380 Nm@1750 |
turbocharged 2.2L I4 Diesel DOHC-4v 125 kW@4000 393 Nm@2000 |
|
Transmission | 8-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,809 mm | 2,697 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,669 mm | 4,549 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,882 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,679 mm | 1,659 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,919 kg | 1,787 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 67 L | 56 L | 11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,034 mm | 1,008 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,455 mm | 1,450 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,402 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 993 mm | 991 mm | 2 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,422 mm | 1,392 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,405 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 927 mm | 1,006 mm | 926 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,941 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,047 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 782 L | 875 L | -93 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,792 L | 1,688 L | 0 L |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 BMW X3.
2019 Mazda CX-5 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
According to the official specs, the Mazda CX-5 offers about a half-inch more rear legroom than the RDX. In reality, though, the Acura has an extra inch or so. While neither is cramped, you'll find significantly more rear seat legroom in a Honda CR-V, Subaru Forester, or Toyota RAV4. If you'll be putting three people in back, the Acura does have the advantage of two additional inches of shoulder room. The RDX's additional width might not be good for handling agility, but it is very good for a rear center passenger. see full Mazda CX-5 review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2019 Mazda CX-5.