Page 1 of 1 | ||
Page 1 of 1 |
2013 BMW X3 xDrive28i Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh While the boosted four has a clear performance advantage, the swap was motivated primarily by the push for better fuel economy. EPA ratings are 21 mpg city, 28 highway, vs. the 2012 six's 19/25. An Audi Q5 comes close, 20/28, but with 211 horsepower isn't as strong. Despite weighing about... Comparison vehicle: 2011 Audi Q5 |
|
2013 Mercedes-Benz GLK350 Review Official TrueDelta review by Michael Karesh If you prioritize performance, the GLK's mandatory 3.5-liter V6, upgraded via direct injection from 268 to 302 horsepower for 2013, might seem a good thing. But even after the power bump, the boosted sixes in the Audi and BMW are stronger, and they're paired with more responsive eight-speed automatics (vs.... Comparison vehicle: 2013 BMW X3 |
|
2007 BMW X3 Pros and Cons Member5393 We get 22.5 mpg consistently in overall averaging and 26 to 27 on open road trips. |
|
2007 BMW X3 Pros and Cons Member5152 |
|
2009 BMW X3 Pros and Cons A member in Oregon, United States Have noticed as low as 10 mpg in start and stop city driving. Average for daily driving is 14 mpg. It uses premium fuel so driving this car is already very expensive. |
|
Looking to trade in your vehicle? Get an estimate of how much it's worth.
| |
2006 BMW X3 Pros and Cons Rudeney City driving fuel economy is not bad for an SUV. I average around 16MPG battling heavy traffic and my need for “enjoying using the accelerator”. Highway mileage is not so great. Cruising at 70-80MPH returns around 22MPG. |