| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2006 BMW X5 and 2010 Acura TSX Specifications
| Model Year | 2006 | 2010 | |
| Model | BMW X5 | Acura TSX | |
| Engine | 4.8L V8 DOHC-4v 355 hp@6200 369 lb-ft@3500 |
3.5L V6 OHC-4v 280 hp@6200 254 lb-ft@5000 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | FWD | |
| Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,819 mm | 2,708 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,666 mm | 4,729 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,872 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,715 mm | 1,440 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 2,275 kg | 1,669 kg | 1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 93 L | 70 L | 23 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,013 mm | 955 mm | -954 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,473 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,412 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,077 mm | 997 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 978 mm | 940 mm | 38 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,453 mm | 1,425 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,377 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 899 mm | 871 mm | 28 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,897 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,948 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 674 L | 357 L | 317 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,540 L | 12.6 | -11.6 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2006 BMW X5
| 2006 BMW X5 Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2005 | 4dr SUV 315-horsepower 4.4L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
We loved the seating and overall room. This was a favortie car for road trips to the mountains or wherever. see full BMW X5 review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Acura TSX
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Drove 4 straight hours in these seats. They hug in corners and don't leave you butt feeling numb even after long drives. Not many seats out there that are more comfortable (Volvo is one of the makers that comes to mind with better seats) see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 Acura TSX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The rear seats can be a little tight for people on the tallish side (for me, anything above 5'10"). This can get more complicated with a tall driver/front passenger and tall rear seat occupants. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
The trunk space is adequate, but get a hatchback or wagon (or SUV if you're into that sort of thing) if you're going to regularly carrying anything more than the usual grocery bags, suitcases, golf bags, etc. That said, the 60/40 split fold rear seats will allow for surprisingly longish items to fit (managed a 6 foot ladder, barely). see full Acura TSX review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
The rear seats are fairly comfortable, but they only provide about 34" of legroom, and there is very little clearance below the seats. see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
If the front seats are pushed back, not a lot of foot room in back see full Acura TSX review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 201-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
There could have been a bit more rear leg space - althoug, the seats are pretty comfortable. see full Acura TSX review |
See TrueDelta's information for all SUVs
See TrueDelta's information for all BMW models.
