Model Year | 2013 | 2003 | |
Model | Ford Expedition | ||
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | |||
Difference | |||
Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
2013 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Cadillac ELR's rear seat is very tight for the average adult, but a couple 5-9 or under can sit back there without outright discomfort. The BMW i8's rear seat is so tight and so vestigial that putting all but the shortest people back there borders on cruel and unusual punishment. I squeezed into the i8's back seat to photograph its instrument panel interior and almost couldn't get out. For those who want an adult-friendly rear seat, the Tesla Model S is far superior to either coupe. see full review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2013 .
2003 Ford Expedition Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2004 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Adequate leg room for adults. Able to transport a whole volleyball team comfortably. see full Ford Expedition review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Seat is firm, promotes good posture which makes it comfortable even on 12 hour days behind the wheel. Plenty of headroom for my fedora. see full Ford Expedition review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Plenty of room for family and pets and whatever else you want to toss in. We thought about the excursion but decided it was way to big and went with expedition. see full Ford Expedition review |
2003 | 4dr SUV 260-horsepower 5.4L V8 4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range |
Great comfortable drivers seat. Should have gotten the captains chairs for both instead of split bench.! see full Ford Expedition review |