Model Year | 2013 | 2009 | |
Model | Buick Enclave | Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 288 hp@6300 270 lb-ft@3400 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 237 hp@6000 253 lb-ft@3000 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed automated manual | |
Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 118.9 in | 103.7 in | 15.2 in |
Length | 201.9 in | 180.0 in | 21.9 in |
Width | 79.0 in | 69.4 in | 9.6 in |
Height | 70.3 in | 58.7 in | 11.6 in |
Curb Weight | 4922 lb. | 3480 lb. | 1442 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 22.0 gal. | 15.3 gal. | 6.7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 40.4 in | 39.6 in | 0.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 61.6 in | 54.7 in | 6.9 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 53.3 in | 3.9 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 41.3 in | 42.2 in | -0.9 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 39.4 in | 36.9 in | 2.5 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 61.3 in | 54.3 in | 7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.0 in | 54.1 in | 2.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 36.8 in | 36.1 in | 0.7 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 37.8 in | 0.0 in | 37.8 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 57.4 in | 0.0 in | 57.4 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 48.3 in | 0.0 in | 48.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 33.2 in | 0.0 in | 33.2 in |
Total Legroom | 111.3 in (over 3 rows) | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 33 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 23.3 ft3 | 11.6 ft3 | 11.7 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 68.9 ft3 | 11.6 | 57.3 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 115.2 ft3 | 11.6 ft3 | 103.6 ft3 |
2013 Buick Enclave Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 4dr SUV 288-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very comfortable seats for long trips. Lots of adjustment see full Buick Enclave review |
2009 Mitsubishi Lancer Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 4dr Sedan 168-horsepower 2.4L I4 6-speed shiftable CVT FWD |
These seats desperately need more lumbar support. They're okay in short distances, but I really want the Recaros from the Evo a few hours in. Stronger side bolsters would be nice for hoon duty, too. see full Mitsubishi Lancer review |