Model Year | 2017 | 2016 | |
Model | Buick Regal | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,738 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,831 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,857 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,483 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,675 kg | 1,636 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 51 L | 17 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,041 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,407 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 1,001 mm | 934 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,382 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 947 mm | 927 mm | 20 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,017 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 402 L | 694 L | -292 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 14.2 | 1,489 L | 13.2 |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Buick Regal.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford C-MAX.