We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Buick Verano vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Chart is based on 6 fuel economy reports for the Buick Verano and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Buick Verano MPG

Buick Verano Buick Verano 2013 37.6 MPG Highway Percentage 72 percent Buick Verano Buick Verano 2013 25.6 MPG Highway Percentage 60 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
hills v.lt light 0 3 25 72 60 37.6  
2013 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
flat light light 10 30 0 60 60 25.6  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Buick Verano fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos MPG

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 21.0 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 30.0 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 31.0 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.1 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 28.8 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 27.1 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 35.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 23.8 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 21.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 30.0  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 31.0  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 28.1  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 28.8  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 27.1  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD
flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 35.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD
hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 23.8  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Buick Verano vs. Volkswagen Eos MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Buick Verano and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Buick models and Volkswagen models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Buick Verano

Buick Verano Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
A lot of weight and enough power to move it don't make for class-leading fuel economy. So it should come as no surprise that the Verano's EPA ratings, 21 mpg city and 30 highway, trail those of some V6-powered midsize sedans. The ILX 2.4 does just a single mpg better, though. The benchmark for quick compact sedans is currently set by the BMW 3-Series, with ratings of 23/33. In my suburban driving the trip computer typically reported low 20s. A highway stretch netted only 27. With a light foot I could also manage 27 in the suburbs. But if you're not going to use the turbo, why pay for it? see full Buick Verano review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Buick Verano

Buick Verano Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
I did see 39 mpg on a tankful of gas just commuting on the highway 118 miles at 60 mph. It great fuel economy and it is what I expect from turbo-4 these days. see full Buick Verano review
2012 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 2.4L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
We previously owned a Cruze LTZ with the 1.4L Turbo and the Verano's 2.4L was by far the winner on fuel mileage. We got 700km out ouf a tank of fuel with an average speed of 110 km's see full Buick Verano review
Buick Verano Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2013 4dr Sedan turbocharged 250hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic FWD
Fuel economy is respectable on the Turbo engine (for a high-performance engine). I was disappointed in the unimpressive fuel economy with the base 2.4L engine. see full Buick Verano review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD
On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD
I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review