Model Year | 2016 | 2021 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,663 mm | 4,788 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,842 mm | 1,915 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,392 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,550 kg | 1,584 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 59 L | 2 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 955 mm | 955 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,374 mm | 1,430 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,374 mm | 1,394 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 892 mm | 884 mm | 8 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,298 mm | 1,326 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,130 mm | 1,204 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 737 mm | 114 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,821 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 294 L | 382 L | -88 L |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2021 Ford Mustang.