| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Cadillac ATS and 2009 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2009 | |
| Model | Cadillac ATS | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 2,776 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,643 mm | 4,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,806 mm | 1,806 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,420 mm | 1,471 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 1,480 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 70 L | -9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 986 mm | -6 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,468 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,387 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,059 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 960 mm | -25 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,369 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 973 mm | -122 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,032 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume | 289 L | 425 L | -136 L |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
| 2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Toyota Camry
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
excellent legroom see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
very comfortable on long and short trips see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 268-horsepower 3.5L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
more comfortable than Accord and Nissan see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 169-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Very noisy at high way speeds. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Just could not get comfortable. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 158-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
Front seat comfort is another subjective measurement. Our experience driving our 06 and 08 Accords has been that we feel little discomfort or back pain during long trips. We did have more such problems with our 05 and 06 rentals, although not severe. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
