We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Cadillac ATS vs. Toyota Sequoia MPG

Chart is based on 7 fuel economy reports for the Cadillac ATS and 36 fuel economy reports for the Toyota Sequoia.

Cadillac ATS MPG

Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2014 24.6 MPG Highway Percentage 49 percent Cadillac ATS Cadillac ATS 2013 28.2 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2014 4dr Sedan turbocharged 272hp 2.0L I4
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med light 0 28 22 49 75 24.6  
2013 4dr Sedan 321-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med none 0 0 15 85 80 28.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Cadillac ATS fuel economy data.

Toyota Sequoia MPG

Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2008 16.3 MPG Highway Percentage 77 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2008 15.7 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2007 12.7 MPG Highway Percentage 18 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2007 14.8 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2005 15.7 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2005 16.0 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2004 17.0 MPG Highway Percentage 15 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2003 13.9 MPG Highway Percentage 10 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2003 17.4 MPG Highway Percentage 59 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2002 15.4 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Toyota Sequoia Toyota Sequoia 2001 15.0 MPG Highway Percentage 30 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd MPG
2008 4dr SUV 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD
flat med hvy 3 13 7 77 75 16.3  
2008 4dr SUV 381-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 12 20 28 40 68 15.7  
2007 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med light 20 37 25 18 69 12.7  
2007 4dr SUV 273-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat med hvy 0 40 60 0 0 14.8  
2005 4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed automatic RWD
flat med none 8 20 43 30 70 15.7  
2005 4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 0 5 80 15 70 16.0  
2004 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat light light 25 10 50 15 63 17.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2003 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med hvy 50 40 0 10 70 13.9  
2003 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
flat light light 3 8 30 59 68 17.4  
2002 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8
4-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
hills lead hvy 10 10 30 50 65 15.4  
2001 4dr SUV 240-horsepower 4.7L V8
4-speed automatic RWD
flat med hvy 23 25 23 30 60 15.0  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Toyota Sequoia fuel economy data.

Cadillac ATS vs. Toyota Sequoia MPG

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Cadillac ATS and Toyota Sequoia's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world MPG based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans and Coupes.
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models and Toyota models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac ATS

Cadillac ATS Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
On paper, the ATS's engines meet or exceed competitors. Even the base 2.5-liter four-cylinder engine peaks at over 200 horsepower, while the 2.0-liter turbo kicks out 272 and the 3.6-liter V6 321. I found the base engine more satisfactory than most reviewers have. But the other two don't feel as strong as their power ratings suggest they ought to, and could also sound and feel more sophisticated and thrilling. They're all fairly good engines, but none of them is a great engine. Fuel economy falls short of the BMW. The 2.0T engine is EPA-rated 19 city, 30 highway with a manual transmission, 21/31 with an automatic. Step up to the V6, and the numbers fall to 18/28. Deduct a couple of highway mpg with AWD. The BMW's ratings are much higher. The 328i's 2.0T engine is rated 22/34 with a manual transmission, 23/33 with a six-speed automatic. The 335i's six-cylinder engine when paired with an eight-speed automatic transmission somehow manages the same EPA rating as the 328i's four-cylinder. In the real world it doesn't fare as well, though. The V6 in the Infiniti in conjunction with a seven-speed automatic transmission is about even with that in the Cadillac, 19/27. Pair it with a manual transmission and the numbers fall to 18/25, worst of the bunch. see full Cadillac ATS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Cadillac ATS

None of our members have yet commented on the real gas mileage of the Cadillac ATS.

Be the first!

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Toyota Sequoia

Toyota Sequoia Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2005 4dr SUV 282-horsepower 4.7L V8
5-speed automatic 4WD w/low range
Overall average 16mpg, not bad for SUV but definitly needs improved. see full Toyota Sequoia review