Model Year | 2016 | 2023 | |
Model | Cadillac ATS | Toyota Sequoia | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,776 mm | 3,099 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,643 mm | 5,286 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,806 mm | 2,027 mm | -1 mm |
Height | 1,420 mm | 1,892 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,530 kg | 2,549 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 85 L | -24 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 980 mm | 996 mm | -16 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,402 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,590 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,080 mm | 1,046 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 935 mm | 975 mm | -40 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,570 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,328 mm | 1,544 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 851 mm | 996 mm | -145 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 904 mm | -904 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,590 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,293 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 856 mm | -856 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,930 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,898 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 289 L | 326 L | -37 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 10.2 | 1,388 L | 9.2 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 10.2 | 2,461 L | 8.2 |
2016 Cadillac ATS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Unfortunately, the "why nots" from three years ago remain. The compact Cadillac sedan's rear seat hasn't gotten any larger, and the coupe's is even tighter. Meanwhile, Audi, Lexus, and Mercedes have introduced competitors with roomier rear seats. At 5-9 I can sit behind myself with a little room to spare in the ATS sedan, and virtually none to spare in the ATS coupe. Drivers who need the seat further back than I do will eliminate leg room for all but the shortest rear passengers. see full Cadillac ATS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Cadillac ATS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2023 Toyota Sequoia.