Model Year | 2010 | 2020 | |
Model | Cadillac CTS | Chevrolet Traverse | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Wagon | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,880 mm | 3,071 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,867 mm | 5,189 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,501 mm | 1,796 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,828 kg | 1,979 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 68 L | 73 L | -5 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 986 mm | 1,049 mm | 985 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,440 mm | 1,577 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,400 mm | 1,476 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 945 mm | 1,016 mm | 944 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,580 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,374 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 912 mm | 975 mm | -63 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 970 mm | -970 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,461 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,232 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 851 mm | -851 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,989 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,868 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 708 L | 651 L | 57 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 25.0 | 1,645 L | 24 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,642 L | 2,781 L | -1 L |
2010 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Cadillac CTS.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Chevrolet Traverse.