| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2008 Cadillac CTS and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications
| Model Year | 2008 | 2013 | |
| Model | Cadillac CTS | Land Rover Range Rover Evoque | |
| Engine | 3.6L V6 DOHC-4v 263 hp@6200 252 lb-ft@3100 |
turbocharged 2.0L I4 DOHC-4v 240 hp@5500 251 lb-ft@1750 |
|
| Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | AWD | |
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 113.4 in | 104.8 in | 8.6 in |
| Length | 191.6 in | 171.5 in | 20.1 in |
| Width | 72.5 in | 77.4 in | -4.9 in |
| Height | 58.0 in | 64.4 in | -6.4 in |
| Curb Weight | 4001 lb. | 3680 lb. | 321 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.0 gal. | 18.5 gal. | -0.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.8 in | 40.3 in | -1.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.7 in | 56.6 in | 0.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 55.1 in | 0.0 in | 55.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 43.1 in | -0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.2 in | 39.7 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 54.7 in | 55.4 in | -0.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 54.1 in | 0.0 in | 54.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 35.9 in | 35.7 in | 0.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 78.3 in (over 2 rows) | 78.8 in (over 2 rows) | -0.5 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.6 ft3 | 20.3 ft3 | -6.7 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.6 ft3 | 51.0 ft3 | -37.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2008 Cadillac CTS
| 2008 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
supportive but comfortable for a long trip see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2007 | 4dr Sedan 210-horsepower 2.8L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Size of the car gives it lots of interior room compared to comparably priced cars in segment see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Ingress is tight, limited legroom. see full Cadillac CTS review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The rear seats are a little snug, but bareable. However, if someone is pretty tall they might bump their head on the ceiling. see full Cadillac CTS review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.
