Cadillac CTS (2011) vs. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque (2013) Specs

vs.

◆

2011 Cadillac CTS and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Specifications

Model Year	2011	2013
Model	Cadillac CTS	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Engine
Transmission
Drivetrain
Body	4dr Wagon	4dr SUV
			Difference
Wheelbase	113.4 in	104.8 in	8.6 in
Length	191.6 in	171.5 in	20.1 in
Width	72.6 in	77.4 in	-4.8 in
Height	59.1 in	64.4 in	-5.3 in
Curb Weight	4031 lb.	3680 lb.	351 lb.
Fuel Capacity	18.0 gal.	18.5 gal.	-0.5 gal.
Headroom, Row 1	38.8 in	40.3 in	-1.5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 1	56.7 in	56.6 in	0.1 in
Hip Room, Row 1	55.1 in	0.0 in	55.1 in
Legroom, Row 1	42.4 in	43.1 in	-0.7 in
Headroom, Row 2	37.2 in	39.7 in	-2.5 in
Shoulder Room, Row 2	56.3 in	55.4 in	0.9 in
Hip Room, Row 2	54.1 in	0.0 in	54.1 in
Legroom, Row 2	35.9 in	35.7 in	0.2 in
Total Legroom	78.3 in (over 2 rows)	78.8 in (over 2 rows)	-0.5 in
Cargo Volume, Minimum	25.0 ft³	20.3 ft³	4.7 ft³
Cargo Volume, Maximum	58.0 ft³	51.0 ft³	7 ft³

2011 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	The optional Recaro seats are a must despite their $3,400 price, as they provide power-adjustable side bolsters that provide far better lateral support than the standard seats. But the Recaro seats aren't very comfortable, with overly firm bulges here and there. Though the lumbar support can be power-adjusted vertically as well as in-and-out, I couldn't find any position where it was comfortable and ended up adjusting it for minimum intrusiveness. see full Cadillac CTS review

2011 Cadillac CTS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr Sedan 270-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Hard to get in and out of. not much head room. The material is nice. see full Cadillac CTS review

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
Year	Comment
	When I first drove an Evoque, I found its front seats cushier and more comfortable than those in the X1. But that was for a short test drive. With more seat time later, the seat felt overly firm beneath my bum and the left seat cushion bolster pressed uncomfortably into my thigh. We're all shaped differently, and we sit differently as well, so your impressions may vary. As with any car, try to get as much seat time as you can before buying--few things are harder than seat comfort to evaluate during a test drive. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Seat Room and Comfort: Pros
Year	Body/Powertrain	Comment
2012	4dr SUV turbocharged 240hp 2.0L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD	Astonishingly, the rear seats in this small SUV seat two six footers (and another, smaller middle passenger) very comfortably. see full Land Rover Range Rover Evoque review

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans, Wagons, and Coupes.

See TrueDelta's information for all Cadillac models.