Model Year | 2014 | 2010 | |
Model | Cadillac ELR | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Coupe | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 106.1 in | 107.1 in | -1 in |
Length | 186.0 in | 188.1 in | -2.1 in |
Width | 72.7 in | 73.9 in | -1.2 in |
Height | 55.9 in | 55.6 in | 0.3 in |
Curb Weight | 4050 lb. | 3401 lb. | 649 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 9.3 gal. | 16.0 gal. | -6.7 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 36.9 in | 38.5 in | -1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 55.2 in | 55.3 in | -0.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 52.9 in | 53.4 in | -0.5 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.2 in | 42.4 in | -0.2 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 34.7 in | 34.7 in | 0 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 49.9 in | 51.6 in | -1.7 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 48.6 in | 46.8 in | 1.8 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 33.6 in | 29.8 in | 3.8 in |
Total Legroom | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 3.6 in |
Cargo Volume | 10.5 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | -2.9 ft3 |
2014 Cadillac ELR Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2014 | Both cars have comfortable front seats, but the ELR's provide more lateral support, at least with the $2,450 brown interior option (which adds power adjusters to their modestly sized side bolsters). Front seat access isn't among the ELR's strengths. As is often the case with coupes, the doors are long and heavy. see full Cadillac ELR review |
2014 Cadillac ELR Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The Volt's rear seat is pretty tight. The Cadillac ELR's is even tighter. At 5-9, I barely have enough space for my head and knees, and this when sitting behind someone my own size. Put someone taller in the front seat, and even pre-teens will have trouble squeezing into the back seat. This being a two-door, rear seat access is also dicey. The Tesla's rear seat is far roomier than either GM car's. Plus a rear-facing third row is optional. see full Cadillac ELR review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Cadillac ELR.
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
2009 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Perfect seating position for both of us. Nice cush for your tush see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |