Model Year | 2009 | 2018 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Ford C-MAX | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Hatch | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,649 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,409 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,829 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,623 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,651 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 51 L | 25 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 1,041 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,026 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 1,001 mm | 974 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,402 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,318 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 927 mm | -926 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 0 mm | 615 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,953 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 694 L | -456 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 24.5 | 892.5 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 1,489 L | 0 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2018 Ford C-MAX.