Model Year | 2009 | 2006 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | 4.6L V8 DOHC-4v 239 kW@6400 427 Nm@4400 |
4.6L V8 OHC-2v 224 kW@5750 434 Nm@4500 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 5-speed automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | RWD | |
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,765 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,951 kg | 1,599 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 61 L | 15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,361 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,085 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 881 mm | 94 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 770 mm | -769 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 0 mm | 615 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,854 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 371 L | -133 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 13.1 | 903.9 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 13.1 | -12.1 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
seat is comfortable can be adjusted to suit your choice of position all controls are within easy reach see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Driving position is very flexible, all the controls are within reach and easy to use. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
Plenty of leg room for tall people like me. see full Ford Mustang review |
2006 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2007 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
While our present government may blow off the standards & principles of the Geneva Convention, I still find them worthy enough to abide. Mustang rear seats are in clear violation. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
The Mustang is a cool car, but nowhere near as comfortable see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Not much room in the back of a Mustang... see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Coupe 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is small for adults. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seat is for kids. see full Ford Mustang review |
2005 | 2dr Convertible 300-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
Rear seats in name only. No real passenger room see full Ford Mustang review |