Model Year | 2009 | 2012 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Ford Mustang | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 2dr Coupe | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,778 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,412 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,564 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 61 L | 15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 978 mm | -977 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 881 mm | 94 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,311 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,189 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 757 mm | -756 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 0 mm | 615 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 379 L | -141 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 13.4 | 903.6 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 13.4 | -12.4 L |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2009 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |