Model Year | 2008 | 2020 | |
Model | Cadillac SRX | Lexus ES | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr SUV | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,957 mm | 2,870 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,950 mm | 4,976 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,844 mm | 1,864 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,722 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,889 kg | 1,655 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 76 L | 60 L | 16 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 1,024 mm | 953 mm | -952 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,491 mm | 1,420 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,430 mm | 1,397 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,069 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 975 mm | 960 mm | 15 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,463 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,430 mm | 1,379 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,041 mm | 996 mm | -995 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 889 mm | 0 mm | 889 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 1,107 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 1,400 mm | 0 mm | 1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 615 mm | 0 mm | 615 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,725 mm (over 3 rows) | 2,073 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 238 L | 473 L | -235 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 917 L | 16.7 | 900.3 L |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,968 L | 16.7 | -15.7 L |
2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
2 teenage kids love it see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The car is very comfortable to ride in. My SRX has all the bells and whistles with electric seat controls. I often adjust the lumbar support to my needs depending on how bad my back is hurting that day. Heated seats also make for a very warm tush on a cold day. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 Cadillac SRX Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Seat belts attached to front seats and not adjustable up and down. Lower sitting heighth than Lexus or other crossover SUVs or at least the appearance of same. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2008 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
The center console is too wide and gets in the way see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 255-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
Much smaller compare to the R-class. The third row is a joke. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2007 | 4dr SUV 320-horsepower 4.6L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
For how big the SRX looks, it's passenger space is somewhat craped. It's not terrible by any means, but it's not very roomy either. see full Cadillac SRX review |
2020 Lexus ES Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2019 | From 2014 on Mazdas have had their front wheels located farther from the passenger compartment than the typical front-wheel-drive car. This opens up space for larger exhaust manifolds behind the engine, for improved performance and efficiency. It also gives the cars more attractive, rear-wheel-drive-like proportions. But it has a price: reduced rear legroom. The Lexus ES provides rear seat passengers with much more room to stretch their legs. Sitting in the rear seat, I can barely reach the front seatback with an outstretched arm. While the first few generations of the Lexus ES were related to the Toyota Camry, the 2013 and 2019 are related to the larger Toyota Avalon. This said, I should also note that the rear seat cushion is the Lexus is mounted somehwat low to the floor, so rear seat passengers also have more need to stretch out if they desire under-thigh support. The new Lexus ES is the sleekest and sportiest to date, and sporty rear roof line's also have a price. see full Lexus ES review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Lexus ES.