MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us
Sign up your car for the TrueDelta survey and get free access to all of the data on this page. Click here to get started!

Cadillac STS and Mercury Milan Lemon Odds and Nada Odds for the Year Ending June 30, 2018

An asterisk (*) marks results based on small sample sizes.

Switch to bar graph

Year Make/Model Nada Odds per 100 Cars Lemon Odds per 100 Cars    
39 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 88500 miles driven2011 Mercury Milan
[?] see reported repairs
  39 vehicles, 11.4 months per vehicle, 88500 miles driven
69 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 100300 miles driven

Refreshed for this model year.2010		 Mercury Milan
[?] see reported repairs
  69 vehicles, 11.6 months per vehicle, 100300 miles driven

Refreshed for this model year.
25 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 109600 miles driven2008 Mercury Milan Join or sign in to view   see reported repairs
  25 vehicles, 11.8 months per vehicle, 109600 miles driven
26 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 121500 miles driven2007 Mercury Milan Join or sign in to view   see reported repairs
  26 vehicles, 11.3 months per vehicle, 121500 miles driven

Return to top

Cadillac STS vs. Mercury Milan Lemon Odds and Nada Odds

Other sources of Cadillac STS and Mercury Milan reliability data provide only averages, which can conceal as much as they reveal. So we also report the percentage of Cadillac STSs and Mercury Milans with no repairs at all in the past year and the percentage of Cadillac STSs and Mercury Milans that are lemons (required three or more repair trips in the past year). These figures might surprise you.

These stats are promptly updated four times a year, to closely track Cadillac STS and Mercury Milan lemon odds as the cars age. Others can be over a year behind. Only TrueDelta tells you how reliable the Cadillac STS and Mercury Milan have been recently.

To see how frequently Cadillac STS and Mercury Milan problems occur, check out our car reliability stats.

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Cadillac STS

Cadillac STS Brand Reputation: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2008 4dr Sedan 320-horsepower 4.6L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic AWD		 My second caddy.. I am very happy see full Cadillac STS review
2006 4dr Sedan 254-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Cadillacs are well made and dependable. see full Cadillac STS review
2006 4dr Sedan 320-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Its a Cadillac - the best the US auto manufactures can offer. see full Cadillac STS review
2006 4dr Sedan 254-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 I appreciate the heritage of Cadillac. see full Cadillac STS review
2005 4dr Sedan 255-horsepower 3.6L V6
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 This is my third Caddy and the others were old guy cars,very reliable and comfy, this is sporty and handles more like a German sedan. see full Cadillac STS review
2005 4dr Sedan 320-horsepower 4.6L V8
5-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Cadillac has always been a leader in the American made car market. see full Cadillac STS review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Brand Reputation of the Mercury Milan

Mercury Milan Brand Reputation: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6
6-speed automatic FWD		 Persistent rumors that Ford will drop the line; Sable has already been dropped. The Milan Premier, although touted by Mercury as an upscale car, is nothing more than a re-badged Fusion and not as comfortable as my 2000 Taurus. see full Mercury Milan review
2008 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4
5-speed automatic FWD		 Ford is not known for beating the Japanese in reliability. But at the time I bought this the Milan was rated more trouble free than Camry by consumer reports. I have only added gas and oil. It runs the same at 54K as 18K. see full Mercury Milan review