Model Year | 2015 | 2010 | |
Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Explorer Sport Trac | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 2dr Convertible | 4dr SUT | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 3,315 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,836 mm | 5,339 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,918 mm | 1,872 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,389 mm | 1,842 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,812 kg | 2,048 kg | -1 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 85 L | -14 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 960 mm | 1,011 mm | 959 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,443 mm | 1,499 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,407 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 907 mm | 978 mm | -71 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,080 mm | 1,496 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,410 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 937 mm | -178 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,014 mm (over 2 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume | 289 L | 0.0 | 289 L |
2015 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
Neither rear seat has enough headroom for someone of even my modest (5-9) height. I could scrunch down and ride back there for a little while, but I'd almost rather walk. Getting into and out of the back seat pose additional challenges. If you want a somewhat similar car with an adult-worthy back seat, check out the much larger, much heavier Dodge Challenger. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet Camaro.
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2010 Ford Explorer Sport Trac.