| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2012 Chevrolet Camaro and 2003 Ford Fusion Specifications
| Model Year | 2012 | 2003 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Fusion | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | |||
| Difference | |||
| Total Legroom | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in (over 1 rows) | 0 in |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2012 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2003 Ford Fusion
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2003 Ford Fusion.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
