| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2013 Chevrolet Camaro and 2009 Ford Fusion Specifications
| Model Year | 2013 | 2009 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Ford Fusion | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 112.3 in | 107.4 in | 4.9 in |
| Length | 190.4 in | 190.2 in | 0.2 in |
| Width | 75.5 in | 72.2 in | 3.3 in |
| Height | 54.2 in | 57.2 in | -3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3780 lb. | 3101 lb. | 679 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 17.5 gal. | 1.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 37.4 in | 38.7 in | -1.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 56.9 in | 57.4 in | -0.5 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0.0 in | 54.0 in | -54 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.4 in | 42.3 in | 0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 35.3 in | 37.8 in | -2.5 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 50.4 in | 56.5 in | -6.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0.0 in | 53.6 in | -53.6 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 29.9 in | 37.0 in | -7.1 in |
| Total Legroom | 72.3 in (over 2 rows) | 79.3 in (over 2 rows) | -7 in |
| Cargo Volume | 11.3 ft3 | 15.8 ft3 | -4.5 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2013 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Convertible 400-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seating is not meant for a Adult but a child or a set of golf clubs.. & a few complaints over the comfort.. in long drives.. any thing over a hour or more. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2009 Ford Fusion
| 2009 Ford Fusion Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
All passengers have commented about the generous space and overall comfort of the rear seat. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2010 | 4dr Sedan 175-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed automatic FWD |
Controls are easily adjusted to fit any driver. Lateral support is good without feeling pinched into the seat. Dead pedal is perfectly positioned. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic AWD |
The power drivers seat makes it easy to find a seating position suitable to any driver. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Lots of leg room. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2009 Ford Fusion Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Limited legroom. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed automatic FWD |
The roofline should be a few inches higher, and the lower section of the centre stack should be narrower to provide more room for the right knee. see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 160-horsepower 2.3L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
not for full size adults, but good for pre-teens see full Ford Fusion review |
| 2008 | 4dr Sedan 221-horsepower 3.0L V6 6-speed automatic FWD |
Seat support seemed to break down over the 2 years I drove this vehicle. Window was very high in relation to the seat. see full Ford Fusion review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
