| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2011 Chevrolet Camaro and 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2011 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Camaro | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 2dr Coupe | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,852 mm | 2,670 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,836 mm | 4,656 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,918 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,377 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,715 kg | 1,485 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 63 L | 9 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 950 mm | 1,031 mm | 949 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,445 mm | 1,433 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 0 mm | 1,336 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,077 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 897 mm | 975 mm | -78 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,280 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 0 mm | 1,313 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 759 mm | 947 mm | -188 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 907 mm | -907 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,285 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,001 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 716 mm | -716 mm |
| Total Legroom | 1,836 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,703 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 320 L | 292 L | 28 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 11.3 | 968 L | -956.7 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 11.3 | 1,792 L | 10.3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Chevrolet Camaro
| 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The rear seat is small and unlike the nonconvertable does not have a center seat. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
The interior leather seats are extremely comfortable to the point where my wife commented that she could sit in them for hours more.They are firm with good support. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Envelops you in a cocoon from which to manage the beat within. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2011 Chevrolet Camaro Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
comfort is fine, but not for large adults. All the kids are gone now so no problem for me. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6 6-speed shiftable automatic RWD |
Not to complain about a great car, but a muscle car like the Camaro is really bought as a 2 seater, but for short trips, can accomodate 4. see full Chevrolet Camaro review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
