MENU
1 0 3 4 3 4

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

Chevrolet Camaro vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Chart is based on 147 fuel economy reports for the Chevrolet Camaro and 31 fuel economy reports for the Volkswagen Eos.

Chevrolet Camaro g/100m

Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2015 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 40 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2014 6.3 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2013 4.1 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 5.4 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 4.3 MPG Highway Percentage 100 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2012 5.5 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 6.1 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 4.5 MPG Highway Percentage 62 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2011 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 11.5 MPG Highway Percentage 70 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 5.7 MPG Highway Percentage 45 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 55 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2010 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 44 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 5.1 MPG Highway Percentage 41 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 19.7 MPG Highway Percentage 31 percent Chevrolet Camaro Chevrolet Camaro 2002 4.4 MPG Highway Percentage 0 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2015 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 hills med none 5 20 35 40 75 4.5  
2014 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med none 10 90 0 0 0 6.3  
2013 2dr Coupe 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 hills med light 11 17 28 44 80 4.1  
2012 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med none 0 10 35 55 60 5.4  
2012 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med none 0 0 0 100 75 4.3  
2012 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med hvy 10 30 10 50 75 5.5  
2011 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 0 40 18 43 60 6.1  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2011 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat lead light 0 2 36 62 77 4.5  
2011 2dr Coupe 312-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 hills lead light 0 20 0 80 80 4.8  
2010 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 3 10 17 70 89 11.5  
2010 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 5 22 28 45 74 5.7  
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 flat med light 7 25 14 55 62 4.8  
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed manual RWD		 flat med light 9 17 30 44 67 4.4  
2002 2dr Hatch 310-horsepower 5.7L V8
4-speed automatic RWD		 flat med light 4 12 43 41 72 5.1  
2002 2dr Hatch 200-horsepower 3.8L V6
5-speed manual RWD		 hills med none 0 10 60 31 120 19.7  
2002 2dr Convertible 310-horsepower 5.7L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 flat light light 0 35 65 0 0 4.4  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Chevrolet Camaro fuel economy data.

Volkswagen Eos g/100m

Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2013 4.8 MPG Highway Percentage 1 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 3.3 MPG Highway Percentage 50 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2009 3.2 MPG Highway Percentage 85 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 3.6 MPG Highway Percentage 75 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2008 3.5 MPG Highway Percentage 43 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 3.7 MPG Highway Percentage 35 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 2.0 MPG Highway Percentage 80 percent Volkswagen Eos Volkswagen Eos 2007 4.2 MPG Highway Percentage 78 percent
Year Body/Powertrain flat, hilly, or mountainousLand driving style: very light to "lead foot"Foot A/C use: none to heavyA/C constant stop and goTraf % many stops per mileCity % stop every mile or twoSub % fairly steady speedHwy % Hwy Spd g/100m
2013 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 0 23 76 1 70 4.8  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat light none 0 0 50 50 65 3.3  
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 15 0 85 60 3.2  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 flat med light 6 19 0 75 65 3.6  
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med light 9 15 33 43 63 3.5  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat med none 9 15 42 35 68 3.7  
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 140hp 2.0L I4 Diesel
6-speed automated manual FWD		 flat light light 0 5 15 80 75 2.0  
Looking for a warranty? Get a quote.
2007 2dr Hardtop conv. 250-horsepower 3.2L V6
6-speed automated manual FWD		 hills lead light 3 10 10 78 78 4.2  

Return to top

This page shows only averages. See all the Volkswagen Eos fuel economy data.

Chevrolet Camaro vs. Volkswagen Eos Fuel Economy (g/100m)

Unlike other fuel economy surveys, TrueDelta's Real-World Gas Mileage Survey includes questions about how and where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of the Chevrolet Camaro and Volkswagen Eos's where a car was driven. So you can get an idea of their real-world g/100m based on how and where you drive a car.

See TrueDelta's information for all Coupes and Convertibles.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models and Volkswagen models.

TrueDelta Reviews the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearComment
Another fairly obvious "why not to buy," for either car: fuel economy. The tested Camaro scored 16 mpg city and 25 mpg highway in the EPA's tests, slightly better than the Mustang's 15/25. The automatic has an even taller top gear and when paired with it the V8 can deactivate four cylinders, so it manages 17 mpg city, 28 mpg highway--the latter figure as high as that for the Camaro V6 automatic (19/28). For significantly better fuel economy it's necessary to get the 2.0-liter turbo, which scores 21/30 with a manual and 22/31 with an automatic. In my 300-odd miles of driving I averaged 16.5 mpg. If I drove with a light foot I could coax the average slightly over 20. I observed similar real-world numbers in the Mustang. On a 70-mph highway the Camaro averaged 24.5, but there might have been a modest headwind. The Mustang averaged 28 in my highway driving. Overall, both achieve very good fuel efficiency for cars of their weight and horsepower, but praise doesn't come much fainter. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Chevrolet Camaro

Chevrolet Camaro Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2017 2dr Coupe 455-horsepower 6.2L V8
8-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Surprisingly, this 455hp car, with a 6.2L V8 -- that's 378 cubic inches -- gets decent gas mileage. It averages just over 20mpg, for which I credit the cylinder shutoff feature. So far it's been pretty common to look at the dash when I'm just beetling across town and see that it's in V4 mode, and getting 40 or 50mpg, as long as I'm keeping my right loafer rather light. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2012 2dr Convertible 323-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 avg 18city/22hwy see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 400-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 i am getting 25 mpg at 75 mph with a custom tune from DiabloSport. compared to the challenger srt-8 which gets 16 mpg highway! see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 426-horsepower 6.2L V8
6-speed manual RWD		 great considering its at 426 HP see full Chevrolet Camaro review
2010 2dr Coupe 304-horsepower 3.6L V6
6-speed shiftable automatic RWD		 Fuel economy is really great if your not mashing the gas pedal. see full Chevrolet Camaro review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Real Gas Mileage of the Volkswagen Eos

Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Pros
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2009 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed manual FWD		 On the freeway, I get 32 MPG with the cruise set at 65. Around town, I get about 30, driving conservatively. On my commute, I find that I get 27 if I drive like everyone else, zooming and stopping. If I make an effort to minimize braking, and coast on the hills and where ever possible, I’ve gotten as high as 35 MPG on the same route. The car does need 91 octane—it will run on 89 octane, but the mileage goes down, so it is a false economy. see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 31 mpg plus on road trips see full Volkswagen Eos review
2008 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 For my short commute I average 25 mpg. Driving longer distances with the top up I get better than 32 mpg. see full Volkswagen Eos review
Volkswagen Eos Real Gas Mileage: Cons
YearBody/PowertrainComment
2012 2dr Hardtop conv. turbocharged 200hp 2.0L I4
6-speed automated manual FWD		 I have averaged 27.3 MPG since new which in itself is not bad but the engine requires a minimum of 91 octane fuel. Based on availability that makes it require 93 octane fuel. If the added fuel cost is considered that effectively makes fuel cost the same as a car averaging 25 MPG using 87 octane fuel. Most of my driving is highway and I do not view this as economical for a 2 liter 4. My other car has a 35% more powerful engine and is both larger and heavier but has lower fuel cost. see full Volkswagen Eos review