2011 Ford Mustang Ford Mustang 2016

We are 103,000+ car owners sharing real-world car information.

Join Us

(2011) vs. Ford Mustang (2016) Specs

How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2011 and 2016 Ford Mustang specs.

2011 and 2016 Ford Mustang Specifications

Model Year 2011 2016  
Model Ford Mustang  
Engine  
Transmission  
Drivetrain  
Body  
      Difference
Total Legroom 0 mm (over 1 row) 0 mm (over 1 row) 0 mm

Return to top

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2011 .

Be the first!

TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

2016 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons
YearComment
This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review
 

What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang

None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Ford Mustang.

Be the first!

See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.