Chevrolet Cobalt (2010) vs. (2015) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2015 specs.
2010 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2015 Specifications
| Model Year |
2010 |
2015 |
|
| Model |
Chevrolet Cobalt |
|
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
| 2009 |
4dr Sedan turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD |
4 door has more headroom and backseat is much improved over the 2 door i previously owned
see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 |
2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD |
With only 2 doors, the rear seats are pretty much useless. Obviously, if you really have to, you can fit people back there, but no one will want to climb back there when everyone at work is going out to lunch.
see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2009 |
2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4
5-speed manual FWD |
Not alot of head room and the steering wheel does not telescope. I fit in it fine but someone tall might not. minor thing really.
see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015
| 2016 |
The CX-3's driving position is very good, more car-like even than the HR-V's. The view forward is open. The view rearward, not so much, as the racy styling yields rear windows that are quite a bit smaller than the front ones. To help compensate, the outside mirrors are large plus blind sport warning is standard on the Touring and Grand Touring.
The CX-3's driver seat is very comfortable and provides good lateral support in turns. The cloth center pocket is cushy without being mushy. Unlike in the HR-V and some others, the headrest does not jut uncomfortably far forward. But the lumbar bulge is not adjustable. As is, it fit my back well, but many people will wish for more of a bulge. The HR-V's also non-adjustable lumbar bulge was too pronounced for my taste. The JUKE's seats are comfortable, but for effective side bolsters (and then some) you must step up to the NISMO.
Worth noting for those of you who get your coffee to go: the cup holders are located beneath the armrest (optional on the Sport, standard on the others). If you want to use them, then you can't use the armrest.
see full review |
| 2015 Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
For people who have no interest in a manual transmission (the great majority), the Mazda CX-3's largest shortcoming is a rear seat that is tight even by small car standards. Sitting behind my 5-9 self, my knees pressed lightly against the front seat backs. I wasn't uncomfortable, but felt a little closed-in. A shame, as rear headroom is relatively plentiful and the rear seat is otherwise very comfortable.
The HR-V provides about four inches more rear legroom, a big difference.
According to their specs, the JUKE has three inches less rear legroom than the Mazda. In reality, though, I had perhaps an inch more rear knee room, but less rear headroom. The Nissan's rear seat might be slightly more adult-friendly than the Mazda's, but neither is a good choice if people taller than me will be sitting in both rows.
see full review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 .
Be the first!
See TrueDelta's information for all
Coupes and
Sedans.
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.
