| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet Cobalt and 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2015 | |
| Model | Chevrolet Cobalt | Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 103.3 in | 105.1 in | -1.8 in |
| Length | 180.5 in | 183.3 in | -2.8 in |
| Width | 67.9 in | 70.9 in | -3 in |
| Height | 57.1 in | 66.1 in | -9 in |
| Curb Weight | 2780 lb. | 3274 lb. | -494 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 13.0 gal. | 16.6 gal. | -3.6 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.5 in | 40.6 in | -2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 53.0 in | 56.4 in | -3.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 49.5 in | 52.6 in | -3.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 41.8 in | 40.9 in | 0.9 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 37.7 in | 38.4 in | -0.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 51.4 in | 56.0 in | -4.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 49.6 in | 51.7 in | -2.1 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 33.7 in | 37.3 in | -3.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 35.7 in | -35.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.6 in | -50.6 in |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 39.4 in | -39.4 in |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 28.2 in | -28.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 75.5 in (over 2 rows) | 106.4 in (over 3 rows) | -30.9 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 13.9 ft3 | 10.3 ft3 | 3.6 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 13.9 | 34.2 ft3 | -20.3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 13.9 ft3 | 63.3 ft3 | -49.4 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt
| 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
4 door has more headroom and backseat is much improved over the 2 door i previously owned see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2010 Chevrolet Cobalt Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
With only 2 doors, the rear seats are pretty much useless. Obviously, if you really have to, you can fit people back there, but no one will want to climb back there when everyone at work is going out to lunch. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
| 2009 | 2dr Coupe turbocharged 260hp 2.0L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
Not alot of head room and the steering wheel does not telescope. I fit in it fine but someone tall might not. minor thing really. see full Chevrolet Cobalt review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
| 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| There's a reason three-row crossovers tend to be much larger than this pair. The third-row seat in the Kia Sorento doesn't provide enough headroom for the average adult male. Both comfort and knee room are also in short supply. You might think that a seat couldn't get any tighter than the Sorento's third row. But, based on the official specs, the Outlander has nearly four inches less combined legroom--a huge difference. Even children won't fit in the Mitsubishi's third row unless you slide the second row forward much of the way. The 2014's third row seat is at least a conventional seat. Last year it was little more than a sling. In either vehicle the second row split bench is roomy and comfortable, with enough height off the floor to provide adults with good thigh support. But the rear passengers in the Outlander don't get air vents. Those in the Kia do. see full Mitsubishi Outlander review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander.
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
