Model Year | 2012 | 2017 | |
Model | Chevrolet Cruze | Honda Pilot | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,685 mm | 2,819 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,597 mm | 4,940 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,796 mm | 1,996 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,476 mm | 1,773 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,407 kg | 1,839 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 59 L | 74 L | -15 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,019 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,501 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,039 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 1,021 mm | 962 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,575 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,455 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 899 mm | 975 mm | -76 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 988 mm | -988 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,463 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,133 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 810 mm | -810 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,824 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 467 L | -31 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.4 | 1,325 L | 14.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 2,376 L | 13.4 |
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Sedan 138-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat legroom is a bit tight with the front seats fully back. see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 138hp 1.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Unfortunately there is no leg room in the rear of the car when the front seats are a particular distant from the dashboard. So either all the people when riding in this car need to be small people like no more then 5 foot?! or you can only have two 6 foot people in it at a time. needs serious improvements there! see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
2017 Honda Pilot Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2016 | According to their spec sheets, the Ford Explorer and Nissan Pathfinder have more rear legroom than the new Honda Pilot. In practice, though, the Pilot's rear legroom feels at least as generous as theirs--I suspect some creative measuring--and well ahead of what you'll find in a Toyota Highlander. The Pilot's second-row seat isn't as high off the floor as the Ford Explorer's, but is more comfortably positioned than the low benches in the GM crossovers and the Pathfinder. The Elite trim level includes captains chairs, so it can only seat up to seven people. With a second-row split bench, other Pilots can seat eight people. The Pilot's largest seating advantage is its third row. Unlike in most crossovers, the cabin remains broad in the "way back," so there's enough shoulder room for three passengers. The Highlander's third-row bench, though also designed for three passengers, is somewhat narrower and lacking in legroom. Only the GM crossovers roughly match the new Pilot in third-row space as well as passenger capacity. The Pilot's seats are positioned so that the view forward from each is open, further enhancing perceived roominess. see full Honda Pilot review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2017 Honda Pilot.