Model Year | 2012 | 2016 | |
Model | Chevrolet Cruze | Toyota Sienna | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,685 mm | 3,030 mm | -1 mm |
Length | 4,597 mm | 5,085 mm | -1 mm |
Width | 1,796 mm | 1,984 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,476 mm | 1,750 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,407 kg | 1,955 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 59 L | 76 L | -17 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 998 mm | 1,041 mm | 997 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,392 mm | 1,651 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,346 mm | 1,488 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,072 mm | 1,029 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 963 mm | 1,008 mm | 962 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,369 mm | 1,641 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,331 mm | 1,679 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 899 mm | 955 mm | -56 mm |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 973 mm | -973 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,552 mm | -1 mm |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,278 mm | -1 mm |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 922 mm | -922 mm |
Total Legroom | 1,971 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,906 mm (over 3 rows) | -1 mm |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 436 L | 1,107 L | 435 L |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 15.4 | 2,466 L | 13.4 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 15.4 | 4,248 L | 11.4 |
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2013 | 4dr Sedan 138-horsepower 1.8L I4 6-speed manual FWD |
Rear seat legroom is a bit tight with the front seats fully back. see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
2012 | 4dr Sedan turbocharged 138hp 1.4L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Unfortunately there is no leg room in the rear of the car when the front seats are a particular distant from the dashboard. So either all the people when riding in this car need to be small people like no more then 5 foot?! or you can only have two 6 foot people in it at a time. needs serious improvements there! see full Chevrolet Cruze review |
2016 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2016 Toyota Sienna.