| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2010 Chevrolet HHR and 2014 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2010 | 2014 | |
| Model | Chevrolet HHR | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Wagon | 2dr Convertible | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,629 mm | 2,720 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,475 mm | 4,788 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,755 mm | 1,877 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,603 mm | 1,417 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,431 kg | 1,647 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 61 L | 61 L | 0 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 1,006 mm | 986 mm | -985 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,359 mm | 1,405 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,273 mm | 1,356 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,031 mm | 1,077 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 991 mm | 927 mm | 64 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,339 mm | 1,143 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,285 mm | 1,148 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,003 mm | 757 mm | -756 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,834 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 674 L | 272 L | 402 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 1,634 L | 9.6 | -8.6 L |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2010 Chevrolet HHR
| 2010 Chevrolet HHR Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
It is roomy and comfortable. see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 155-horsepower 2.2L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
The HHR has one of the most comfortable seats for me of most of the cars that I have driven. see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2010 Chevrolet HHR Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
little leg room see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
seat-back very annoying and driving position difficult to get right see full Chevrolet HHR review |
| 2009 | 4dr Wagon 172-horsepower 2.4L I4 4-speed automatic FWD |
low roof limits passenger packaging space - poor knee room see full Chevrolet HHR review |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| This "why not" should not come as a surprise. Neither the Mustang nor the Audi has much rear legroom. Plus in the Mustang my head was pressed against the rear window, and I'm only 5-9. The Mustang coupe's rear seat is viable only for people up to 5-6 or so in height. The Audi has a little more rear headroom. As does the Mustang convertible. If you will be putting people into the rear seat of the Mustang, you should turn off the "easy entry" feature. When it's activated, this feature automatically motors the seat backward when the engine is shut off, reducing rear legroom to near zero. I was nearly trapped when I turned the engine off while sitting in the back seat to take photos. If you want a V8-powered coupe with a roomy rear seat, get a Dodge Challenger. Both the Mustang and the RS 5 do a better job of transporting luggage than rear seat passengers. Both trunks have about as much capacity as that of the average compact sedan. see full Ford Mustang review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Ford Mustang
| 2014 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather. see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Wagons
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
