Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo (2004) vs. Ford Mustang (2013) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo and 2013 Ford Mustang specs.
2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo and 2013 Ford Mustang Specifications
Model Year |
2004 |
2013 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo |
Ford Mustang |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Total Legroom |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in (over 1 rows) |
0 in |
Return to top
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2004 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo
2005 |
4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof.
see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Ford Mustang
2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2013 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.