Model Year | 2006 | 2014 | |
Model | Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo | Toyota Sienna | |
Engine | |||
Transmission | |||
Drivetrain | |||
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Minivan, ext. | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 110.5 in | 119.3 in | -8.8 in |
Length | 200.4 in | 200.2 in | 0.2 in |
Width | 72.9 in | 78.2 in | -5.3 in |
Height | 58.7 in | 68.9 in | -10.2 in |
Curb Weight | 3553 lb. | 4310 lb. | -757 lb. |
Fuel Capacity | 17.5 gal. | 20.0 gal. | -2.5 gal. |
Headroom, Row 1 | 39.4 in | 41.0 in | -1.6 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 58.7 in | 65.0 in | -6.3 in |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 56.4 in | 58.6 in | -2.2 in |
Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 40.5 in | 1.8 in |
Headroom, Row 2 | 37.8 in | 39.7 in | -1.9 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 58.6 in | 64.6 in | -6 in |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 57.2 in | 66.1 in | -8.9 in |
Legroom, Row 2 | 37.6 in | 37.6 in | 0 in |
Headroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 38.3 in | -38.3 in |
Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 61.1 in | -61.1 in |
Hip Room, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 50.3 in | -50.3 in |
Legroom, Row 3 | 0.0 in | 36.3 in | -36.3 in |
Total Legroom | 79.9 in (over 2 rows) | 114.4 in (over 3 rows) | -34.5 in |
Cargo Volume, Minimum | 18.6 ft3 | 39.1 ft3 | -20.5 ft3 |
Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 18.6 | 87.1 ft3 | -68.5 |
Cargo Volume, Maximum | 18.6 ft3 | 150.0 ft3 | -131.4 ft3 |
2006 Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2006 | 4dr Sedan 211-horsepower 3.5L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Interior room is outstanding. Trunk room is phenomenal, especially with flip and fold flat rear seat. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2005 | 4dr Sedan 180-horsepower 3.4L V6 4-speed automatic FWD |
Rear seat had good room. Passengers had good leg room. Only adults over 6ft would touch the backs of the front seat with their legs. Draw back was the low roof. see full Chevrolet Impala / Monte Carlo review |
2014 Toyota Sienna Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | The Sienna's seats are cushier than those in the Odyssey or the Sedona. But I slightly preferred the Sedona's front seats because they had four-way lumbar (rather than two-way) and provided more lateral support. The Toyota earns a clear win in front seat space. The first-row foot wells are unusually wide, and there's no tall center console (as in the Kia) or a protruding center stack (as in the Honda) to crowd the driver's right elbow or knee. This said, a relatively tall instrument panel does cut into the view forward and contribute to the Sienna feeling larger than the others. see full Toyota Sienna review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Toyota Sienna.