| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2016 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Dodge Durango Specifications
| Model Year | 2016 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Dodge Durango | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr SUV | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 3,043 mm | -1 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 5,075 mm | -1 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,925 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,801 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 2,157 kg | -1 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 93 L | -22 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,013 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,486 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,448 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,024 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 1,011 mm | 964 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,481 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,422 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 980 mm | -979 mm |
| Headroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 960 mm | -960 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,280 mm | -1 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 3 | 0 mm | 1,087 mm | -1 mm |
| Legroom, Row 3 | 0 mm | 800 mm | -800 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,804 mm (over 3 rows) | 0 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 487 L | -23 L |
| Cargo Volume, Behind R2 | 16.4 | 1,351 L | 15.4 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 2,393 L | 14.4 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Chevrolet SS
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2016 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Dodge Durango
| 2012 Dodge Durango Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr SUV 290-horsepower 3.6L V6 5-speed shiftable automatic AWD |
There was very little bolstering on the sides of the seat bottoms. I was not able to find a comfortable seating position in the Durango see full Dodge Durango review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
