| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet SS and 2011 Ford Mustang Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2011 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Ford Mustang | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 2dr Coupe | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 107.1 in | 7.7 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 188.1 in | 7.4 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 73.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 55.6 in | 2.3 in |
| Curb Weight | 3975 lb. | 3453 lb. | 522 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 16.0 gal. | 3 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 38.5 in | 0.2 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 55.3 in | 3.8 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 53.4 in | 3.8 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 42.4 in | -0.1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 34.7 in | 3.3 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 51.6 in | 7.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 46.8 in | 11.2 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 29.8 in | 9.9 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 72.2 in (over 2 rows) | 9.8 in |
| Cargo Volume | 16.4 ft3 | 13.4 ft3 | 3 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2011 Ford Mustang
| 2011 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed manual RWD |
Very confortable seats, The stock seats hold you pretty well even in a little senmi-agressing driving. Nice position in the power seats and easy to get the just right spot. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Convertible 315-horsepower 4.6L V8 5-speed automatic RWD |
The adjustability of the power seat. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2011 | 2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope. see full Ford Mustang review |
| 2010 | 2dr Coupe 210-horsepower 4.0L V6 5-speed automatic RWD |
What rear seat room? see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
