Chevrolet SS (2015) vs. Ford Mustang (2012) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Ford Mustang specs.
2015 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Ford Mustang Specifications
Model Year |
2015 |
2012 |
|
Model |
Chevrolet SS |
Ford Mustang |
|
Engine |
|
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
Drivetrain |
|
|
|
Body |
4dr Sedan |
2dr Coupe |
|
|
|
|
Difference |
Wheelbase |
2,916 mm |
2,720 mm |
0 mm |
Length |
4,966 mm |
4,778 mm |
0 mm |
Width |
1,897 mm |
1,877 mm |
0 mm |
Height |
1,471 mm |
1,412 mm |
0 mm |
Curb Weight |
1,803 kg |
1,564 kg |
0 kg |
Fuel Capacity |
72 L |
61 L |
11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 |
983 mm |
978 mm |
5 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
1,501 mm |
1,405 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 |
1,453 mm |
1,356 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 |
1,074 mm |
1,077 mm |
0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 |
965 mm |
881 mm |
84 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
1,499 mm |
1,311 mm |
0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 |
1,473 mm |
1,189 mm |
0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 |
1,008 mm |
757 mm |
-756 mm |
Total Legroom |
2,083 mm (over 2 rows) |
1,834 mm (over 2 rows) |
1 mm |
Cargo Volume |
464 L |
379 L |
85 L |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
Be the first!
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Ford Mustang
2013 |
2dr Coupe 420-horsepower 5.0L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Without the sunroof, there is adequate headroom, legroom, and hiproom for taller drivers (6'6"+). The seats are supportive and comfortable for longer drives. This car makes a competent "daily driver" in fair weather.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2012 Ford Mustang Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
2012 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
My dad's 2010 Camaro has much more legroom than my Mustang. 2 more inches would help a lot, though I have to admit even at 6-3, I'm still pretty comfy in the Mustang. The room would be nice to have on trips.
see full Ford Mustang review |
2011 |
2dr Coupe 305-horsepower 3.7L V6 6-speed manual RWD |
Felt like seating position was "on the floor". Steering wheel had only tilt adjustment, no telescope.
see full Ford Mustang review |
See TrueDelta's information for all
Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.