| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 98.4 in | 16.4 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 161.6 in | 33.9 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 66.7 in | 8 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 60.0 in | -2.1 in |
| Curb Weight | 3997 lb. | 2496 lb. | 1501 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 18.8 gal. | 10.6 gal. | 8.2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 40.4 in | -1.7 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 52.7 in | 6.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 51.5 in | 5.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 41.3 in | 1 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 39.0 in | -1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 51.3 in | 7.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 51.3 in | 6.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 34.5 in | 5.2 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 75.8 in (over 2 rows) | 6.2 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 16.4 ft3 | 20.6 ft3 | -4.2 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 ft3 | 57.3 ft3 | -40.9 ft3 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
