| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2017 Chevrolet SS and 2012 Honda Fit Specifications
| Model Year | 2017 | 2012 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Honda Fit | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Hatch | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,499 mm | 0 mm |
| Length | 4,966 mm | 4,105 mm | 0 mm |
| Width | 1,897 mm | 1,694 mm | 0 mm |
| Height | 1,471 mm | 1,524 mm | 0 mm |
| Curb Weight | 1,813 kg | 1,132 kg | 0 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 71 L | 40 L | 31 L |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 1,026 mm | 982 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,339 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,308 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,049 mm | 0 mm |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 991 mm | -26 mm |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,303 mm | 0 mm |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 876 mm | -875 mm |
| Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 1,925 mm (over 2 rows) | 1 mm |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum | 464 L | 583 L | -119 L |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum | 16.4 | 1,623 L | 15.4 |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2017 Chevrolet SS
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
Rear seat is functional and roomy. I'm 6'4" and with the drivers seat in my preferred postion there is still a decent amount of legroom behind. Overall much better than the Charger/Challenger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2017 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2017 | 4dr Sedan 415-horsepower 6.2L V8 6-speed manual RWD |
The front seat is just OK. Feels like a pretty flat bottom and fairly hard. Also, for a car with sporting pretentions there is surprisingly little side bolstering. see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2012 Honda Fit
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
The best in this category (when you take into consideration the size of the trunk). see full Honda Fit review |
| 2012 Honda Fit Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
Seat bottoms are typical Japanese style short bottomed and not conducive to long duration drives. see full Honda Fit review |
| 2013 | 4dr Hatch 117-horsepower 1.5L I4 5-speed manual FWD |
One more thing. Rear seat comfort was obviously not a big selling point, nor a necessary feature. But one piece of it was worse than it had to be: the rear seat headrests. The artful circular shape and limited adjustment made the rear seats even harder to use; the headrest would tend to jab passengers in their spine. A better solution which was more even with the seat back would really have helped here. see full Honda Fit review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
