Chevrolet SS (2015) vs. Subaru Outback (2016) Specs
How powerful is the engine? How much room is in the back seat? Get the 2015 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Subaru Outback specs.
2015 Chevrolet SS and 2016 Subaru Outback Specifications
| Model Year |
2015 |
2016 |
|
| Model |
Chevrolet SS |
Subaru Outback |
|
| Engine |
|
|
|
| Transmission |
|
|
|
| Drivetrain |
|
|
|
| Body |
4dr Sedan |
4dr Wagon |
|
| |
|
|
Difference |
| Wheelbase |
114.8 in |
108.1 in |
6.7 in |
| Length |
195.5 in |
189.6 in |
5.9 in |
| Width |
74.7 in |
72.4 in |
2.3 in |
| Height |
57.9 in |
66.1 in |
-8.2 in |
| Curb Weight |
3975 lb. |
3593 lb. |
382 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity |
19.0 gal. |
18.5 gal. |
0.5 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 |
38.7 in |
40.8 in |
-2.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 |
59.1 in |
58.1 in |
1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 |
57.2 in |
55.5 in |
1.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 |
42.3 in |
42.9 in |
-0.6 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 |
38.0 in |
38.9 in |
-0.9 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 |
59.0 in |
57.3 in |
1.7 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 |
58.0 in |
55.0 in |
3 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 |
39.7 in |
38.1 in |
1.6 in |
| Total Legroom |
82 in (over 2 rows) |
81 in (over 2 rows) |
1 in |
| Cargo Volume, Minimum |
16.4 ft3 |
35.5 ft3 |
-19.1 ft3 |
| Cargo Volume, Maximum |
16.4 ft3 |
73.3 ft3 |
-56.9 ft3 |
Return to top
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
| 2015 |
Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat.
Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
| 2015 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger.
see full Chevrolet SS review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2015 Chevrolet SS.
Be the first!
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Outback
| 2015 |
Through the 2009 model year, the Outback (and the related Legacy sedan) had a tight back seat. Though marketed as a midsize car, it was actually a compact. The 2010 redesign dramatically expanded the Outback's interior, especially in the back seat. The 2015 redesign added another inch of shoulder room, such that the Outback (and Legacy) are now not only truly midsize, but rank among the roomiest midsize cars. Rear air vents are offered--in Outbacks with leather. So the tested car lacked them.
Some compact crossovers, including the Cherokee, are about as roomy, but they achieve their specs through a more upright seating position. People in the back seat are closer to the front seats, so they don't feel like they have as much room even though they have just as much space for their legs. But they get rear air vents even in the lower trim levels.
see full Subaru Outback review |
| 2016 Subaru Outback Seat Room and Comfort: Cons |
| Year | Comment |
|
The front seats have an unusually high bulge just below my shoulder blades. This feels more odd than uncomfortable, at least to me. The driver's lumbar adjusts, but this affects the area below said bulge. Partly depending on your height your experience might vary. These seats also provide very little lateral support, which admittedly isn't much of an issue given the non-sporting character (and non-sporting tires) of the Outback.
I had no such qualms with the armrest on the door. It's wide and cushy.
In the front seats' favor, for 2015 Subaru has added fore-aft adjustability to the headrests, a rarity in recent moderately priced cars.
The Jeep's cloth seats are too squishy, but they're more form-fittting than the Subaru's, and I find them more comfortable.
see full Subaru Outback review |
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2016 Subaru Outback
See TrueDelta's information for all
SedansSee TrueDelta's information for all
Chevrolet models.
