| 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 |
2014 Chevrolet SS and 2013 Toyota Camry Specifications
| Model Year | 2014 | 2013 | |
| Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Camry | |
| Engine | |||
| Transmission | |||
| Drivetrain | |||
| Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
| Difference | |||
| Wheelbase | 114.8 in | 109.3 in | 5.5 in |
| Length | 195.5 in | 189.2 in | 6.3 in |
| Width | 74.7 in | 71.7 in | 3 in |
| Height | 57.9 in | 57.9 in | 0 in |
| Curb Weight | 3975 lb. | 3190 lb. | 785 lb. |
| Fuel Capacity | 19.0 gal. | 17.0 gal. | 2 gal. |
| Headroom, Row 1 | 38.7 in | 38.8 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 59.1 in | 58.0 in | 1.1 in |
| Hip Room, Row 1 | 57.2 in | 54.5 in | 2.7 in |
| Legroom, Row 1 | 42.3 in | 41.6 in | 0.7 in |
| Headroom, Row 2 | 38.0 in | 38.1 in | -0.1 in |
| Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 59.0 in | 56.6 in | 2.4 in |
| Hip Room, Row 2 | 58.0 in | 54.5 in | 3.5 in |
| Legroom, Row 2 | 39.7 in | 38.9 in | 0.8 in |
| Total Legroom | 82 in (over 2 rows) | 80.5 in (over 2 rows) | 1.5 in |
| Cargo Volume | 16.4 ft3 | 15.4 ft3 | 1 ft3 |
TrueDelta Reviews the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| 2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review | |
| 2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Comment | |
| The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review | ||
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
What Our Members Are Saying about the Seat Room and Comfort of the 2013 Toyota Camry
| 2013 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
Being 6' 3" it can be hard to find a car where I have sufficient legroom & headroom. In the Fusion Hybrid there was lots of space, even with a sunroof. There are also padded surfaces where my left knee rests against the door and where my right leg rests against the center console. The Camry Hybrid was not comfortable. The doors are hard plastic and there was no soft place to rest my knee. The center console was also hard plastic. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 178-horsepower 2.5L I4 6-speed shiftable automatic FWD |
We will use this as a "road car" on longer trips so front seat comfort along with interior -and- trunk room is very good, better than Kia Optima considered. Two large adults comment rear seat also very comfortable. Front seat easier exit too. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2013 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
| Year | Body/Powertrain | Comment |
| 2013 | 0 | Nice ergonomic shape, but not enough padding. Leather seats feel decidedly firm after two months of ownership. Seat cushion length should be slightly longer for thigh support. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
front seat could be improved for better thigh support for tall drivers see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
front seat could be improved for better thigh support for tall drivers see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
The door sills are very high which made it tough for me to get my size 13 shoes up and over when sitting behind a front seat that is all the way back. The door sills in the Camry were lower so while there was no more rear seat room than in the Fusion is was possible to get my feet out more easily. see full Toyota Camry review |
| 2012 | 4dr Sedan 156-horsepower 2.5L I4 Hybrid CVT FWD |
You can see I'm really reaching here to find things that we didn't like about the Fusion Hybrid, but here's one more... There is a small step up in front of the front seats which made it hard to cross my legs like when traveling on road trips. see full Toyota Camry review |
See TrueDelta's information for all Sedans
See TrueDelta's information for all Chevrolet models.
