Model Year | 2014 | 2020 | |
Model | Chevrolet SS | Toyota Camry | |
Engine | 6.2L V8 OHV-2v 415 hp@5900 415 lb-ft@4600 |
3.5L V6 DOHC-4v 301 hp@6600 267 lb-ft@4700 |
|
Transmission | 6-speed shiftable automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic | |
Drivetrain | RWD | FWD | |
Body | 4dr Sedan | 4dr Sedan | |
Difference | |||
Wheelbase | 2,916 mm | 2,824 mm | 0 mm |
Length | 4,966 mm | 4,879 mm | 0 mm |
Width | 1,897 mm | 1,839 mm | 0 mm |
Height | 1,471 mm | 1,445 mm | 0 mm |
Curb Weight | 1,803 kg | 1,610 kg | 0 kg |
Fuel Capacity | 72 L | 61 L | 11 L |
Headroom, Row 1 | 983 mm | 973 mm | 10 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 1 | 1,501 mm | 1,466 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 1 | 1,453 mm | 1,407 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 1 | 1,074 mm | 1,069 mm | 0 mm |
Headroom, Row 2 | 965 mm | 965 mm | 0 mm |
Shoulder Room, Row 2 | 1,499 mm | 1,415 mm | 0 mm |
Hip Room, Row 2 | 1,473 mm | 1,389 mm | 0 mm |
Legroom, Row 2 | 1,008 mm | 965 mm | -964 mm |
Total Legroom | 2,083 mm (over 2 rows) | 2,035 mm (over 2 rows) | 0 mm |
Cargo Volume | 464 L | 428 L | 36 L |
2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Pros | ||
Year | Comment | |
2015 | Despite its slightly more compact exterior, the Chevrolet SS has a roomier back seat than the Dodge Charger. Rear headroom is in unexpectedly short supply in the latter. The Chevrolet also has a couple more inches of rear hiproom, so three adults won't have to get quite as cozy in its back seat. Both cars have about 16 cubic feet of trunk space. A good amount, but you'll find as much in most midsize sedans. Unlike the Charger's, the SS's rear seat cannot fold to expand the trunk. But a pass-through in the center is far larger than most. see full Chevrolet SS review |
2014 Chevrolet SS Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The front seats in the Chevrolet SS are comfortable. They also look like they'd provide generous lateral support, but don't, at least not for those of us who aren't built like linebackers. Thankfully the upper seat back features some synthetic suede trim, and this prevents sliding in hard turns. Still, a car with such high handling limits should have seats with much larger and more effective side bolsters--like those available in the Dodge Charger. see full Chevrolet SS review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2014 Chevrolet SS.
2020 Toyota Camry Seat Room and Comfort: Cons | ||
Year | Comment | |
The rear seat is similarly meh. Passengers back there will encounter a decent amount of legroom (much more than in the Mazda6), but (unless they have very short legs) insufficient thigh support and (if they're of above-average height) the headliner. This last is the price of the current Camry's racier roof line. Perhaps they figure people who require a roomy rear seat will buy a crossover. To be fair, many manufacturers have been sacrificing rear seat headroom for a more stylish roof line, as this seems the best way for sedans to retain appeal in a market hot for crossovers. see full Toyota Camry review |
None of our members have yet commented on the seat room and comfort of the 2020 Toyota Camry.